US lagging behind in ITS - with link to report

The United States is lagging behind other world leaders in the use of new technologies to address traffic congestion, CO2 emissions, traffic crashes, and other major challenges according to a report issued yesterday by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF).
February 1, 2012

The United States is lagging behind other world leaders in the use of new technologies to address traffic congestion, CO2 emissions, traffic crashes, and other major challenges according to a report issued yesterday by the 239 Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF).

Japan, South Korea and Singapore were ranked as the top three nations in the effective deployment of ITS by the new ITIF report: Explaining International IT Leadership: Intelligent Transportation Systems, which outlined several policy and non-policy factors that have resulted in the United States falling behind other world leaders in technology deployment. (<%$Linker:External000oLinkExternalThe full 58-page report is available here.The full 58-page report is available here.falsehttp://www.itif.org/files/2010-1-27-ITS_Leadership.pdffalsefalse%>)

According to the report, the US federal government must assume a far greater leadership role in the deployment of ITS technologies, which it calls “the 21st Century digital equivalent of the Interstate Highway System.”  The report also calls for an annual investment of between US$2.5 to $3 billion in ITS deployment and large-scale demonstration projects, with federal transportation funding being tied to states’ actual improvements in transportation system performance.

“This report should be a serious wake-up call to our nation’s transportation leaders and policymakers as to why the United States is not staying competitive in the international market,” said Scott Belcher, president and CEO of 560 ITS America, “Other industrialised nations have learned that a major key to transportation efficiency and economic growth is by deploying intelligent transportation systems to allow for the safe and easy movement of goods and people.
“We have the opportunity to reverse this disparity if we decide as a nation to commit to applying 21st Century technology to address our transportation problems,” Belcher said.

Belcher, along with Robert Atkinson, president, ITIF, Stephen Ezell, senior analyst, ITIF, Riz Khaliz, global business executive, ITS and Growth Markets, 62 IBM Global Government, and Masahiro Nishikawa, 2058 Japan Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transportation and Tourism (MILT) participated in an ITIF transportation forum that discussed the findings of the report.

“There are dazzling technologies at work in the world of transportation, from real-time alerts to drivers about impending road hazards to smart traffic signals, to displays of real-time traffic conditions available on your cell phone or vehicle dashboard display,” said ITIF’s Stephen Ezell, the author of the report.  “Unfortunately, the United States is lagging behind many nations when it comes to using them. Our report analyses how countries have deployed ITS, why the United States lags behind, and urges expanded federal leadership and investment to get the United States onto the road to deploying ITS.”

The report found that nations that are ITS leaders:

  • Demonstrate national-level commitment and vision;
  • Make substantial investments in ITS;
  • Have strong government leadership in setting the ITS vision and agenda, convening relevant stakeholders, and spearheading implementation;
  • Have a high-degree of centralisation in ITS decision making and deployment (in some cases direct control of highways);
  • Recognise ITS as a “force-multiplier” for the transportation network that enables a shift to performance-based transportation systems;
  • View their ITS investments as a platform through which the private-sector can develop value-added products and services.

The report states that the major policy issues that have caused the United States to fall behind other nations include:

  • Lack of funding;
  • Lack of sufficient federal vision and leadership. (By statute, federal role limited to ITS research, not ITS deployment.)
  • Reliance on states for deployment;
  • Systemic barriers: chicken-or-egg system interdependencies; scale challenges;
  • ITS not politically compelling, in part because there is no assessment system to validate ITS benefits.